Quincy, Quorum's AI assistant, provides all your policy intelligence in one AI connected workspace. Included in Quorum Grassroots, Quincy is trained on 10+ years of Quorum's proprietary data and queries the entire government affairs ecosystem, including your grassroots campaigns, advocate records, and supporter activity, alongside federal and state legislation, stakeholder notes, committee transcripts, and more, to give you insights you can actually trust.
You Ask Quincy
How are our active grassroots campaigns performing, and which ones need attention?
Quincy Delivers*
Your active grassroots campaigns are seeing strong engagement, with a total of 938 actions recorded in the last three months. The most active campaigns currently focus on digital privacy and data protection, as evidenced by numerous letters sent to federal and state officials in Texas, Virginia, and California. Supporters are consistently urging lawmakers to advance comprehensive data privacy legislation.
Other campaigns with notable activity include advocacy for open government data in California, with multiple letters sent to school board members highlighting the impact of open data policies on local communities.
However, the data also shows that most recent actions are concentrated around a few key issues (digital privacy and open data). If you have campaigns on other topics that are not seeing similar engagement, those may need additional attention — such as renewed outreach, targeted communications, or new calls to action.
To review all recent grassroots activity and identify which campaigns may need a boost, you can view the full results here. If you'd like a breakdown by campaign or want to identify campaigns with lower participation, let me know and I can help you dig deeper!
*Example shown for demonstration; actual results may vary.
Why Teams Use Quincy
Rather than waiting for a monthly or quarterly readout, Quincy returned real numbers: 938 recorded actions in the last three months, broken down by issue area, with the campaigns that are losing steam flagged before they stall out completely. A campaign caught in month two, instead of week two, has already burned the momentum that made it worth running in the first place. You're the one flagging the campaign three weeks earlier and already adjusting, instead of explaining in a recap meeting why a campaign underperformed. The same real-time read applies to the feedback your supporters are already giving you.