Stop reacting to the other side. Start getting ahead of them.
Quincy Can Do It
Quincy, Quorum's AI assistant, provides all your policy intelligence in one AI connected workspace. Built into Quorum Federal and Quorum State, Quincy is trained on 10+ years of Quorum's proprietary data and queries the entire government affairs ecosystem, including lawmaker social media, committee activity, competitor engagement, your organization's CRM data, and logged meeting notes, to give you insights you can actually trust.
Know where every lawmaker stands, where your relationships need attention, and where the opposition is gaining ground, before it affects your strategy.
You Ask Quincy
How is the American Petroleum Institute engaging with key Senate committees on energy policy compared to the Sierra Club?
Quincy Delivers*
Here's a side-by-side breakdown of how API and the Sierra Club are each engaging with Senate committees on energy policy.
American Petroleum Institute (API)
Strategic focus: Supporting federal legislation limiting state-level lawsuits targeting energy producers.
Key engagements:
• API and AFPM backing legislation introduced by Senator Ted Cruz aimed at preempting state-level litigation against energy producers.
• API President addressing the Republican Study Committee on federal energy strategy.
• Participation in the State of American Energy event with congressional attendees.
• Direct engagement with Senate Energy & Natural Resources and Commerce Committee members on permitting reform.
Sierra Club
Strategic focus: Advocating for stronger federal environmental protections and pushing back on fossil fuel expansion.
Key engagements:
• Cited in Senate Budget Committee statements on climate risk and federal spending.
• Analysis referenced in Senate LNG export debates.
• Research cited on crypto mining and climate impact during committee testimony.
• Involvement in hydropower policy debates and Senate ENR discussions.
• Contributions to Senate committee reports advocating for stronger emissions standards.
Side-by-side takeaways:
• API is playing offense on preemption and permitting; Sierra Club is embedded in policy narratives shaping committee reports and floor debate.
• API's engagement skews Republican leadership; Sierra Club's engagement skews committee analytical work.
• Both are shaping the same committees from different angles.
Strategic implication for your team:
• If you're advocating on either side of energy policy, engaging where the other side is already positioning is where the leverage lives.
All sourced, all linked in Quorum.
*Example shown for demonstration; actual results may vary.
Why Teams Use Quincy
Knowing your own legislative strategy is one thing. Knowing how organizations on the other side of your issue are engaging with the same committees and lawmakers is what lets you get ahead of them. Ask Quincy:
"How is the American Petroleum Institute engaging with key Senate committees on energy policy compared to the Sierra Club?"
For example, Quincy returns a side-by-side breakdown: API backing legislation with Senator Cruz, Sierra Club being cited in Senate Budget Committee statements and LNG export debates. Both sides of your issue, sourced and linked, from one question. No manual research. No guessing where the opposition is gaining ground.